When I hit my extensive e-mail list to ask my friends and colleagues
for their opinions on the state of the creative writing workshop, the
general response seemed evasive and troubled. And it was often the
creative writing professionals themselves who seemed the most evasive
and the most troubled. Some of them seemed uncomfortable with the idea
that I intended to rag on the workshop, yet no one offered much
endorsement of it beyond comments like, “I’ve never had a bad
experience teaching creative writing on the graduate level,” which
sounds to me like, “I never met a man I didn’t like.” Or, worse, like,
“I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” One quite famous
writer said:
I’m really tired...of hearing the writing workshop itself bashed. What
is so offensive or suspect about a group of people, with the guidance
of an experienced writer, discussing their work, discussing literature
as writers, and functioning as both a community and board of editors
for one another? If they want to read and write among others who want
to read and write, should they be paying for tanning booths or
vacations to Majorca instead? And if we want to bash something, how
about mountaintop mining, or the genocide in Darfur?
This is such a persuasive response, and in some ways the best of what I
received, yet also emblematic of the faint praise the workshop
received. If the strongest case we can make about workshops is that
they are more significant than tanning booths, that they don’t deserve
to be bashed as much as genocide, what are we really saying?
The most meaningful note I got was from a recent MFA grad and adjunct
professor at my own university. I suspect he missed the memo about how
we should all close ranks around the workshop. After reflecting quite
powerfully on how most young people are not prepared for the serious
study of writing, he spoke to what I think has to be the crucial
question in any effective workshop:
Do the writers in the workshop want to improve their writing or do they
just want to hear that they’re already doing well? Many people, it
seems to me, lack the negative capability Keats talked about to admit
that they don’t know many things, that they aren’t good at many things,
and that this is a wonderful situation to be in.
Ah, Negative Capability, my old friend. How long has it been since you
heard anything as cracked as a creative writing student admitting his
own incompetence? And this bozo, this writing instructor, thinks that’s
a “wonderful situation to be in?”
Here’s what I think: Workshops shouldn’t be about improving a student’s
writing. That just gets her better comments in class and a better
quality of rejection letter. Workshops should be about transforming her
writing. Or, better put, about transforming her relationship to her
writing.
After everything, I am a romantic about the possibilities of creative
writing. I want my courses to be about Dr. Seuss realizing that the
thumpy, annoying music of the boat engine was not an impediment to his
writing a book, it was the rhythm of his book. I want them to be about
Flaubert, who, after boring his friends with his first book, thought,
“Why don’t I write something simple? Maybe a story about this woman in
the newspaper here?” I want them to be about Tom Wolfe drafting a
letter to his editor saying that he was incapable of writing a story
about Southern California car culture and then recognizing that the
letter itself was the story. Have you noticed what all of these
examples have in common? Failure. Probably terror, too. Forces that are
both, of course, the foundation for all insight and progress.
close
Article Permissions
Thank you for your permissions request. We do our best to respond immediately, but it may take up to three business days.






Reader Comments
Add a Comment | View All Comments (7)