For seventy-five years Louisiana State
University (LSU), in Baton Rouge, has been home to
two of the country's most storied literary institutions, LSU
Press and the Southern Review.
Books published by the press—including, most famously, John Kennedy Toole's
posthumous best-seller, A
Confederacy of Dunces—have won four Pulitzer Prizes, the National
Book Award, the National Book Critics Circle Award, the American Book Award,
and the Man Booker Prize, among others; the press's poetry list has long been
among the strongest in the nation. The Southern
Review, which was cofounded by Robert Penn Warren, Cleanth Brooks,
and others in 1935, has since nurtured—and often launched—the careers of
several generations of important writers.
But prestige was not enough to save both LSU Press and the Southern
Review from a 20 percent cut in university subsidy in July. They
were among several "ancillary" (nonacademic) university programs affected by a
fifty-two-million-dollar shortfall in state funding for the LSU system. The good news is that despite fears that the
budget cuts might force one or both institutions to close, the press and the
journal have survived mostly intact. The press, which publishes about eighty
books a year, has no plans to reduce that number. And the magazine will
continue to publish quarterly.
"In the end, we're fine," Southern
Review editor Jeanne Leiby says. "People are understandably worried
about us, but we're not going anywhere."
The bad news is that both
institutions are now in full-scale retrenchment mode. LSU Press, which lost
one hundred thousand dollars from its normal university allocation of half a
million dollars, was forced to lay off some employees; director MaryKatherine
Callaway declined to say how many. Future issues of the Southern Review will have an average page count of 180 rather
than the customary 200 to 220.
In addition, LSU Press and the Southern Review must now
divert much of their attention and staff resources away from editorial matters
to seek and/or create new revenue streams. "We will supplement our budget
through grants, donations, and other funds," Callaway wrote in an e-mail. "We
plan to add a development director this year to aid those fund-raising
efforts." The press also plans to expand its e-book program, and to continue to
explore ways to reduce expenses by using new technologies to print books in
smaller print runs, which helps lower initial manufacturing costs and reduce
warehousing fees.
Belt-tightening measures at the Southern Review include reducing or eliminating
outlays for travel, advertising, and office supplies. And a number of readings
and other events planned to commemorate the seventy-fifth anniversary of the
magazine next year have been canceled; others have been converted from free
events open to the public into fund-raising opportunities. "Everything except
the bare bones is being cut," Leiby says. "We'd like to do a mail campaign to
raise money, but we can't because it's too expensive."
Perhaps most poignant of
all, the annual editor's awards for the best poetry, nonfiction, and fiction
published in the magazine each year—named for Warren, Brooks, and Eudora
Welty, respectively—are being discontinued in their present form because the
magazine can't afford the fifteen-hundred-dollar prize each of the winners
usually receives. Instead, Leiby is considering turning the awards into a
contest with a twenty-dollar entry fee. "I don't know if I'm going to do that,
but I feel like I have to consider it," she says. "If you have a thousand
entries at twenty bucks, you're talking real money. But that's also another
thousand manuscripts coming into this office, which is a burden on an already
stressed staff. Can we actually take a thousand more manuscripts to consider?
Can we process, through a state system, a thousand twenty-dollar checks? I have
to say that quietly, because my business manager might pass out."
One option Leiby is not considering is a change in the
content of the magazine, which has a circulation of about three thousand. "I
will not make changes to the magazine that I think would cheapen it," she says.
"By that I mean I'm not going to all of a sudden start publishing things that
would be considered mass market or may have a larger reading audience but not
necessarily an audience that is interested in the best literary fiction and
poetry. I could go out and try to find short pieces by the next J. K. Rowling,
but that's not our audience."
The budget cuts have alarmed and dismayed friends of the
press and the magazine. "It's tremendously disturbing that they're cutting into
these institutions that have done so much for LSU,"
says poet David Kirby, an LSU alumnus and author
of the National Book Award finalist The
House on Boulevard St.: New and Selected Poems, which was published
as part of LSU Press's Southern Messenger Poets
series in 2007. "It's a big, football-loving state school like many others, but
the press and the magazine really make it stand out in the crowd. They are
irreplaceable ambassadors to a larger world of culture, and I hate to see them
crippled in any way."
George Singleton, a South
Carolina–based novelist who has published short stories in the Southern Review, agrees. "These budget cuts are ticking me off,
and I think it's myopic on the part of the university," he says. "For the most
part, big New York City publishers are getting scared and publishing the same
old homogenized stuff. The university presses are doing more cutting-edge work
that's different and that needs to be published. To cut LSU Press's budget, and the Southern Review's budget, is just cutting out literature. You
know, I doubt they're cutting the football program's budget 20 percent. I love
college football more than most people, but I'm going to remember a poem by
Rodney Jones or a short story by Ron Rash that's in the Southern Review in twenty years. I'm not going to remember what
the LSU football team's record was in any particular
year."
The cuts in Baton Rouge are
part of a general scaling back of subsidies for academic presses and literary
magazines as university administrations around the country grapple with the
economic downturn. This year, presses at Utah State University, Eastern
Washington University, and the State University of New York have been affected.
So have university-supported magazines such as the New England Review at Vermont's Middlebury College, whose president,
Ron Liebowitz, recently cut the magazine's budget and gave it until late 2011
to eliminate its deficit with new fund-raising. (The college's budget oversight
committee had proposed to eliminate all financial support for the magazine.) "I
find asking families who are paying fifty thousand dollars a year in
comprehensive fees to, in effect, subsidize a literary magazine that serves a
very small slice of the general population and is known only to a handful of
Middlebury students, a very hard sell," Liebowitz wrote on his official blog in
June.
The posting drew lively and
often sharp responses from supporters and detractors—the latter including poet
Peter Campion, editor of Literary Imagination: The Review of the Association of
Literary Scholars and Critics
(Oxford University Press), who echoed Singleton's remarks about the seeming
imbalance of support for athletic and literary programs. "This statement, from
the president of one of the best liberal arts colleges in the nation, borders
on shocking," he wrote. "I mean, what if you replaced ‘literary magazine' with
‘Division III men's and women's golf and squash teams' or ‘Rikert Skiing
Center.' Surely the literary magazine is much closer to the mission of a
liberal arts college. That it may have less day-to-day involvement with the
Middlebury experience is not the fault of the magazine or its editors but
rather of the administration, which has evidently failed to incorporate it into
curriculum and extracurricular activities." (To read the thread, visit
blogs.middlebury.edu/
rononmiddlebury/2009/06/02/budget-cuts-and-the-new-england-review.)
At LSU, Leiby declines to bite
the hand that still feeds her magazine, albeit more meagerly than before. "I
fully believe that LSU did not want to do this,"
she says. "We have incredible support from the administration. They understand
that both the press and the journal are important; it's just that higher
education is getting slammed. What are they going to do, cut freshman
composition?"
Kevin Nance is a contributing editor of Poets & Writers Magazine.
“LSU Press, which lost one hundred thousand dollars from its normal university allocation of half a million dollars, was forced to lay off some employees.”
Reader Comments
Add a Comment | View All Comments (1)